What the Brazil loss meant: on and off the field

On the field… not nearly as much as some will make out. All I was thinking was that if that Brazil doesn’t come out for the second half like a speeding freight train, Dunga makes Bob Bradley look like Knute Rockne. But Dunga isn’t a bad coach (just a bad dresser), and Brazil was demonstrably better at 10 out of 11 positions than the US. Does the loss hurt? Tremendously. Does the achievement of beating Egypt and Spain to reach a FIFA semifinal still count for something? Yes.

Most importantly for many fans, Bob Bradley clearly saved his own skin here. Nothing other than an outright collapse in the remaining qualifiers can cost him his job now, and there simply isn’t anything anyone can do about it. Do I think there are better coaches available to US Soccer than Bradley right now? Yes, I do, but it is completely and utterly irrelevant. To paraphrase a far worse leader than Bradley, “You go to South Africa with the coach you have, not the coach you want.”

On the field, this tournament proved two big things to me:

  • The national team’s biggest problem (not their only one) is a mental one. For 2-1/2 matches, this team proved, that when its head is in the right place, it can stand toe-to-toe with nearly anyone. Will they always win? Nope, but when everyone is clicking, this team can, at least, frighten any team in the world. The key question going into the World Cup to me, what has to happen for the US to have the correct mindset consistantly.
  • Secondly, Bob Bradley already knows exactly who is going to play at the World Cup. Don’t expect any surprises and that includes Edgar Castillo or Jermaine Jones. As we’ve seen, once Bradley decides he likes you (Beasley, Dempsey, Kljestan, Bornstein, Casey), it takes a near self-immolation in form (Beasley, again) to spur a change. Freddy Adu is not going to play in 2010, neither probably is Jose Francisco Torres. Practically nothing they could do outside of starting for Real Madrid appears to be able to change that. Bradley knows who is going to be on that plane, and I suspect very little can or will change his mind.

Meanwhile.. to off the field:

I think for the first time, we really saw ESPN put its full hype-machine powers behind a soccer event and it was, in turn, both gratifying and somewhat frightening to hear it grabbed on to by just about everyone in the sports media both in and outside of ESPN. Anyone who thought ESPN was going to short-shrift the 2010 WC, was both dumb (they spent a boatload on this, remember) and quickly proven wrong as ESPN put out a release saying they they’re going full-bore including sending lots of folks to South Africa. PS: Please stop moaning about Tirico going as a studio host. This is not a Dave O’Brien situation. I’ve written about this in the past, here.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “What the Brazil loss meant: on and off the field

  1. pretty depressed about your commment on the fact that bradley has already decided his world cup roster. I am depressed because you are right.

  2. I don’t agree with your comments on the selection(s). There are sure to be numerous injuries in the coming year and no-one knows how those will impact the selection process. Not even Bradley, who is about as predictable and transparent as they come. If he has no contingency for such things, then he is not worthy to be the US coach.
    He’s not worthy in my book anyway. By the way Gulati, Luis Aragones just became available. I promise you, he would have done a much better job holding the lead against Brazil.

  3. I don’t think this is the first time they went full-court on the hype machine. They did a pretty damn good job in 2002 when Good Morning America was doing look-ins on the Germany match.

  4. Fair enough, but ESPN’s effect on the sports landscape is so staggeringly large, that to see it now, seven years later, it was so much more dramatic.

  5. Likewise. We can only hope that injuries to the “right” players forces Bobs hand as it did for the Confederations Cup. I guarantee if Hedjuk had been healthy and made the trip and if Boca was ready from game 1, Spector and DeMerit would not have seen one single minute of playing time. Injuries forced Bob’s hand in this tourney. I do not have any hope that he will have learned from this at all.

  6. Or maybe we don’t get there. Maybe tactics are hugely over-rated and what we needed was a guy who could get through to the players at a key moment. I’m not saying I know that, but it’s possible.

  7. On the field: The tournament result, I feel has put US Soccer back another 4 years. Due to our good showing for 225 minutes (Egypt’s full 90, Spain’s full 90 and Brazil’s first 45), it allows everyone to forget the disgraceful games against Italy and Brazil and all the ridiculous Bob Bradley subs. We are not as good as we can be and with our Confederations cup showing, we might forget that we need a new coach (Someone that will play our best players and make subs that have a positive impact on the game)

    In summary: Do not get disillusioned by temporary success, we can not be satisfied. Nations with less talent have been able to obtain greater success (eg. South Korea-2002WC, Senegal-2002WC and Croatia-1998WC)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s