A Cup Just Beyond Our Grasp, But Lessons the USMNT Must Learn

It would be easy, I think, to use this space to slam USMNT coach Bob Bradley for his substitution patterns – not only today, but for the entirety of the Confederations Cup. And I do think there should have been reinforcements starting at the hour mark today, given how the half was unfolding; that Brazil had already pulled a goal back from a 2-0 halftime deficit; and we probably had some tired folks out there.

But I can’t singularly put the blame on Bradley for today’s loss. I think it would be a little over the top, to be honest. Some even go as far as to say the US wins despite Bradley, which is logic I can’t get behind. He deserves appropriate blame for the things that make us lose. But that can’t be given out without also handing proper credit when the team does the things that make us win.

I didn’t have any hope that the US was going to beat Spain on Wednesday. None. That they did was a great accomplishment, and one that today’s come-from-ahead loss shouldn’t wash away from the record or our memories. And today’s final result doesn’t change what we saw from the US in the first half against Brazil today. They were daring, willing to play the game against one of the best, and the counterattack that led to Landon Donovan’s goal to make it 2-0 was a thing of beauty – practically right out of Brazil’s very own playbook.

In the end, it wasn’t enough. Maybe a sub or two on the hour would have made the difference. But I don’t know how many teams could have held out Brazil the way they played in the second half. There were a couple of times where the US was on the ball in somewhat dangerous position, and maybe going up 3-1 or 3-2 would have been enough to win the Confederations Cup once and for all.

We’ll never know. Brazil did what they do and the US wasn’t good enough to hold out despite strong efforts from everyone involved. There’s no shame in that to me.

I don’t think those who still want Bradley fired are going to get their wish between now and the trip to Mexico on August 12. But the US – and the head coach specifically – should take valuable lessons from the last two games; going back to my theme in my last writing about how I felt getting these two games and leaving on good form would be important. Admittedly, I thought that form would come in a loss to Spain and a win over South Africa, but I’m OK with how it turned out.

First lesson: Tighter marking and a greater defensive commitment when up a goal or two in the final 30 minutes. Not a full-out bunker. But bring on players to reinforce those playing their asses off on the field, and above all, make sure everyone is accounted for on restarts. And yes, it’s OK to bring on a mid or forward that can give the opposing defense something to think about when the US does get on the ball, which leads into the next point.

Second lesson: While the other team might be bringing 80% of the pressure, there are still going to be times when the US gets on the ball and can create an attack. Those chances must be taken advantage of. We saw Charlie Davies in the middle of a couple of those chances, and a couple bad passes kill attacks where the US had numbers forward in the face of Brazil’s blitz. Someone has to be cold-hearted enough to hammer the death blow. It’s the only way championships are won. The US were just short of that today, and paid for it. It sucks, but that’s life on the big stage.

But we’ll see this situation again. There’s no reason to think this US team can’t get a lead at Mexico in August. There’s no reason to think the US won’t again have to face a mountain of pressure, away from home, trying to hold on for a meaningful result – one it can be argued would be greater than winning the Confederations Cup.

I know some, maybe many, want someone else in charge prior to that match at Mexico. I can’t say I agree at this point. I don’t know who would take over, and I don’t know that shaking things up in the middle of qualifying is all that hot an idea.

But … there is certainly a valid point in looking at the Mexico match to see if Bradley, and the team, have learned their lessons from this experience. The two extra games proved to be quite valuable both on the field and off. Short of winning the Cup, that’s the best that can be hoped for.

The key issue to me now is how the USMNT builds once the Gold Cup ends and qualifying resumes.


8 thoughts on “A Cup Just Beyond Our Grasp, But Lessons the USMNT Must Learn

  1. We need to attack. We need to hunt for goals. That was the difference between the two games we lost and the second half today and the the two games we won and the first half today.

    Our best defense is a good offense. Aim to win, not to prevent losing.

  2. usa really surprised me playing even if i wanted brazil to win. i was really happy for donovan’s goal which was a AMAZING!!! but i think even if usa were to play them again having a stronger defense and better plays they wouldnt be able to defeat brazil, brazil is one of the most strongest teams in the world and basiclly it’s brazil’s second nature to play soccer unlike usa. for a second i really did believe usa was gonna win lol. i do agree they should get the team more organized like a better defense, mid field and working more with the strikers. overall i give 2 thumbs up for usa’s playing….

  3. I think the big challenge with the USMNT moving forward (after the Gold Cup) is how they mentally prepare for WCQ.

    All the US did in the Confed. Cup was to put a bigger target on their backs. Every team will see the US and will throw even more at them hoping to break them down. There’s not a team in CONCACAF that “respects” the US; they all despise them. This is a major difference than the US faces when it plays Spain, Italy, or Brazil.

    How the US adjusts back to CONCACAF play will tell us what they’ve learned.

  4. TCompton: Exactly. And the reason I kind of glossed over the Gold Cup – while I think it’s a good tournament – is with Bradley making so many roster changes (and rightfully so, in my estimation), it will be hard to judge the process of the true team that we’ll look at in 2010 until we restart qualifying at Mexico.

  5. I don’t go over to the USA forums as a matter of principle. So I don’t know what the current mood is over there, nor do I really care. But that people are still talking about replacing the coach who led this team to the dizzying heights of the last week is preposterous on it’s face.

    This team is winning (and losing) with passion right now. If there’s one thing a coach is responsible for, its passion. Tactics, subs, everything else, is secondary. I can’t believe this is even a topic of conversation right now.

  6. I’m not sure the substitution policy is to blame. While you want to get fresh legs on the field, you have to balance that against an interest in having your best players on the field.

    And our team right now seems thinner than it has been – although that might just be because it seems that our top players are much better than they were in the past, which leaves a larger gap between the A and B team.

    But really – with Michael Bradley out, who do you go to for a midfielder? Yeah, Sacha Kljestan didn’t seem like a great choice, but that’s why we waited so long to put him in. Perhaps we should be happy that Beasley didn’t get subbed in this game.

    I know – why not Torres and Adu. Honestly, I don’t know why not. And neither do the rest of us. It is apparent that Bradley didn’t have plans to use either of them, so I’m not really going to criticise him for not using them. We’ll get our chance to see those players during the Gold Cup, so we will have an opportunity then to determine whether Bradley was right or wrong to exclude them.

  7. Connor Casey should be banned from the bench. WTF was he doing coming on against BRasil? He doesn’t have any pace to counter, and is just a body in the box. We needed and Adu, a Torres, basically anyone not named Connor Casey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s